Hi everyone, this is Team 08!

For this week we’ve done series of testing and make adjustments based on users’ suggestions and issues we’ve found. We also prepared the final documentation, and final presentation.

User didn’t make clear sense on how the tempo of music is changing based on their movements or different ways of using the prop. So we did more adjustments for the processing code part.

Testings are documented in the videos, the last two testings are outstanding, which are also related with the final version of code. They are included as below:

For the final presentation, we take advices from the last presentation — we try to conduct the presentation as clear as we can, so we decided to play the concept video draft at the very beginning to show how the system works. We put sufficient information at the design brief to give a clear sense what it is about. We also went back to previous blogs to review the changes and decisions we made. Through these processes, the result was pretty good.

However, we do have a few issues for the presentation. First, there were two different contents included in the same slide, which seems not proper. Second, we didn’t focus much about the relationship between changes of prop movements and changes of sounds. Third, we didn’t present the differences between testings, which means lack of sufficient testing findings. Therefore, in the formal documentation, we will fix these issues.